Tony Walker Tony Walker's Profile Page

Tony Walker Tony Walker

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

試験の準備方法-最高の2V0-13.24復習教材試験-効果的な2V0-13.24学習指導

空想は人間が素晴らしいアイデアをたくさん思い付くことができますが、行動しなければ何の役に立たないのです。VMwareの2V0-13.24認定試験に合格のにどうしたらいいかと困っているより、パソコンを起動して、CertShikenをクリックしたほうがいいです。CertShikenのトレーニング資料は１００パーセントの合格率を保証しますから、あなたのニーズを満たすことができます。

VMwareの2V0-13.24認証試験の合格証は多くのIT者になる夢を持つ方がとりたいです。でも、その試験はITの専門知識と経験が必要なので、合格するために一般的にも大量の時間とエネルギーをかからなければならなくて、助簡単ではありません。CertShikenは素早く君のVMware試験に関する知識を補充できて、君の時間とエネルギーが節約させるウェブサイトでございます。CertShikenのことに興味があったらネットで提供した部分資料をダウンロードしてください。

>> 2V0-13.24復習教材 <<

2V0-13.24学習指導 & 2V0-13.24無料ダウンロード

従来の見解では、練習資料は、実際の試験に現れる有用な知識を蓄積するために、それらに多くの時間を割く必要があります。 CertShikenただし、VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectの学習に関する質問はVMwareその方法ではありません。以前の2V0-13.24試験受験者のデータによると、合格率は最大98〜100％です。最小限の時間と費用で試験に合格するのに役立つ十分なコンテンツがあります。2V0-13.24 VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect準備資料の最新コンテンツで学習できるように、当社の専門家が毎日更新状況を確認し、彼らの勤勉な仕事と専門的な態度が練習資料に高品質をもたらします。 VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectトレーニングエンジンの初心者である場合は、疑わしいかもしれませんが、参照用に無料のデモが提供されています。

VMware 2V0-13.24 認定試験の出題範囲：

トピック
出題範囲

トピック 1

VMware by Broadcom ソリューションの計画と設計: この試験セクションでは、VMware 管理者のスキルが評価されます。概念モデルを作成するために、ビジネス目標と要件を収集して分析します。さらに、VMware Cloud Foundation の論理設計と物理設計の作成についても取り上げます。これには、ネットワークインフラストラクチャ、VCF 管理ドメイン、VCF ワークロードドメイン、VCF エッジクラスタ、VCF クラウド自動化、および VCF クラウド運用に関連する前提条件と設計上の決定が含まれます。設計では、アベイラビリティゾーン内およびアベイラビリティゾーン間の可用性、管理性 (ライフサイクル管理、スケーラビリティ、キャパシティ管理)、パフォーマンス、回復性 (BCDR 戦略)、および VCF 管理コンポーネントとワークロードのセキュリティを考慮する必要があります。ワークロードのモビリティ、消費、および監視戦略についてもこのセクションで取り上げます。

トピック 2

VMware by Broadcom ソリューションのトラブルシューティングと最適化: このセクションには、このバージョンの試験ではテスト可能な目標はありません。

トピック 3

IT アーキテクチャ、テクノロジー、標準: この試験セクションでは、エンタープライズアーキテクトとソリューションアーキテクトのスキルを測定し、IT アーキテクチャ、テクノロジー、標準の基礎に焦点を当てます。ビジネス要件と技術要件の区別、概念モデルと論理設計と物理設計の理解、要件、前提、制約、リスクの違いの認識などについて扱います。また、可用性、管理性、パフォーマンス、回復性、セキュリティ (AMPRS)、リスク軽減戦略の開発、設計上の決定の文書化、設計検証戦略の作成も含まれます。

トピック 4

VMware by Broadcom ソリューション: この試験セクションでは、クラウドアーキテクトとインフラストラクチャエンジニアのスキルを測定し、VMware by Broadcom ソリューションのアーキテクチャを理解することに重点を置きます。受験者は、さまざまなシナリオに基づいて、さまざまな VMware Cloud Foundation アーキテクチャオプションを区別できる必要があります。

トピック 5

VMware by Broadcom ソリューションのインストール、構成、および管理: このセクションには、このバージョンの試験ではテスト可能な目標はありません。

VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architect 認定 2V0-13.24 試験問題 (Q70-Q75):

質問 # 70
A customer has stated the following requirements for Aria Automation within their VCF implementation:
Users must have access to specific resources based on their company organization.
Developers must only be able to provision to the Development environment.
Production workloads can be placed on DMZ or Production clusters.
What two design decisions must be implemented to satisfy these requirements? (Choose two.)

A. Separate tenants will be configured for Development and Production.
B. Users' access to resources will be controlled by project membership.
C. Separate cloud zones will be configured for Development and Production.
D. Users' access to resources will be controlled by tenant membership.

正解：B、C

解説：
In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2, Aria Automation (formerly vRealize Automation) manages resource provisioning and access control. The requirements involve role-based access, environment isolation, and workload placement flexibility. Let's analyze each option:
Option A: Separate tenants will be configured for Development and ProductionAria Automation in VCF
5.2 operates as a single-tenant application by default, integrated with SDDC Manager and vCenter. Multi- tenancy (separate tenants) is an advanced configuration typically used for service providers, not standard VCF private cloud designs. TheVMware Aria Automation Installation Guidenotes that multi-tenancy adds complexity and isn't required for environment segregation within a single organization. Instead, projects and cloud zones handle these needs, making this unnecessary.
Option B: Users' access to resources will be controlled by tenant membershipTenant membership applies in multi-tenant setups, where users are assigned to distinct tenants (e.g., Dev vs. Prod). Since VCF 5.2 typically uses a single tenant, and the requirements can be met with projects (group-based access), this isn't a must-have decision. TheVCF 5.2 Architectural Guidefavors project-based access over tenant separation for organizational control, rendering this optional.
Option C: Users' access to resources will be controlled by project membershipProjects in Aria Automation group users and define their access to resources (e.g., cloud zones, policies). To meet the first requirement (access based on company organization) and the second (developers provisioning only to Development), projects can restrict developers to a "Dev" project linked to a Development cloud zone, while other teams (e.g., ops) access Production/DMZ via separate projects. TheVMware Aria Automation Administration Guideconfirms projects as the primary mechanism for role-based access in VCF, making this a required decision.
Option D: Separate cloud zones will be configured for Development and ProductionCloud zones in Aria Automation map to vSphere clusters or resource pools (e.g., Development, Production, DMZ clusters). To satisfy the second requirement (developers limited to Development) and the third (Production workloads on DMZ or Production clusters), separate cloud zones ensure environment isolation and placement flexibility.
TheVCF 5.2 Architectural Guidemandates cloud zones for workload segregation, tying them to projects for access control, making this essential.
Conclusion:
C: Project membership enforces user access per organization and restricts developers to Development, meeting the first two requirements.
D: Separate cloud zones isolate Development from Production/DMZ, enabling precise workload placement per the third requirement.These decisions align with Aria Automation's design in VCF 5.2.References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architectural Guide(docs.vmware.com): Aria Automation Design and Cloud Zones.
VMware Aria Automation Administration Guide(docs.vmware.com): Projects and Access Control.
VMware Aria Automation Installation Guide(docs.vmware.com): Tenancy Options in VCF.

質問 # 71
An architect is planning resources for a new cluster that will be integrated into an existing VI Workload Domain. The cluster's primary purpose is to support a mission-critical application with five resource-intensive virtual machines. Which design recommendation should the architect provide to prevent resource bottlenecks while meeting the N+1 availability requirement and keeping the overall investment cost minimal?

A. Establish a cluster with four hosts and implement rules to prioritize resources for the application virtual machines.
B. Establish a cluster with six hosts and implement automated placement rules to keep the application virtual machines together.
C. Establish a cluster with six hosts and implement automated placement rules to distribute the application virtual machines.
D. Establish a cluster with three hosts and exclusively run the application virtual machines on this cluster.

正解：A

質問 # 72
What should be included in a conceptual model to ensure it reflects the scalability of the VMware Cloud Foundation solution?
(Choose two)
Response:

A. The specific models and configurations of network switches
B. The types of servers to be used for deployment
C. The ability to scale storage and compute independently
D. Logical groupings of compute, storage, and networking resources

正解：C、D

質問 # 73
An architect is documenting the design for a new VMware Cloud Foundation solution. During workshops with key stakeholders, the architect discovered that some of the workloads that will be hosted within the Workload Domains will need to be connected to an existing Fibre Channel storage array. How should the architect document this information within the design?

A. As a constraint
B. As an assumption
C. As a business requirement
D. As a design decision

正解：A

解説：
In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2, design documentation categorizes information into requirements, assumptions, constraints, risks, and decisions to guide the solution's implementation. The need for workloads in VI Workload Domains to connect to an existing Fibre Channel (FC) storage array has specific implications.
Let's analyze how this should be classified:
Option A: As an assumptionAn assumption is a statement taken as true without proof, typically used when information is uncertain or unverified. The scenario states that the architectdiscoveredthis need during workshops with stakeholders, implying it's a confirmed fact, not a guess. Documenting it as an assumption (e.
g., "We assume workloads need FC storage") would understate its certainty and misrepresent its role in the design process. This option is incorrect.
Option B: As a constraintThis is the correct answer. Aconstraintis a limitation or restriction that influences the design, often imposed by existing infrastructure, policies, or resources. The requirement to use an existing FC storage array limits the storage options for the VI Workload Domains, as VCF natively uses vSAN as the principal storage for workload domains. Integrating FC storage introduces additional complexity (e.g., FC zoning, HBA configuration) and restricts the design from relying solely on vSAN. In VCF 5.2, external storage like FC is supported via supplemental storage for VI Workload Domains, but it's a deviation from the default architecture, making it a constraint imposed by the environment. Documenting it as such ensures it's accounted for in planning and implementation.
Option C: As a design decisionA design decision is a deliberate choice made by the architect to meet requirements (e.g., "We will use FC storage over iSCSI"). Here, the need for FC storage is a stakeholder- provided fact, not a choice the architect made. The decision tosupportFC storage might follow, but the initial discovery is a pre-existing condition, not the decision itself. Classifying it as a design decision skips the step of recognizing it as a design input, making this option incorrect.
Option D: As a business requirementA business requirement defineswhatthe organization needs to achieve (e.g., "Workloads must support 99.9% uptime"). While the FC storage need relates to workloads, it's a technical specification abouthowconnectivity is achieved, not a high-level business goal. Business requirements typically originate from organizational objectives, not infrastructure details discovered in workshops. This option is too broad and misaligned with the technical nature of the information, making it incorrect.
Conclusion:The need to connect workloads to an existing FC storage array is aconstraint(Option B) because it limits the storage design options for the VI Workload Domains and reflects an existing environmental factor. In VCF 5.2, this would influence the architect to plan for Fibre Channel HBAs, external storage configuration, and compatibility with vSphere, documenting it as a constraint ensures these considerations are addressed.
References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide (Section: VI Workload Domain Storage Options) VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Planning and Preparation Guide (Section: Design Constraints and Assumptions) vSphere 7.0U3 Storage Guide (integrated in VCF 5.2): External Storage Integration

質問 # 74
An administrator is documenting the design for a new VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) solution. During discovery workshops with the customer, the following information was shared with the architect:
All users and administrators of the solution will need to be authenticated using accounts in the corporate directory service.
The solution will need to be deployed across two geographically separate locations and run in an Active
/Standby configuration where supported.
The management applications deployed as part of the solution will need to be recovered to the standby location in the event of a disaster.
All management applications will need to be deployed into a management tooling zone of the network, which is separated from the corporate network zone by multiple firewalls.
The corporate directory service is deployed in the corporate zone.
There is an internal organization policy that requires each application instance (management or end user) to detail the ports that access is required on through the firewall separately.
Firewall rule requests are processed manually one application instance at a time and typically take a minimum of 8 weeks to complete.
The customer also informed the architect that the new solution needs to be deployed and ready to start the organization's acceptance into service process within 3 months, as it is a dependency in the deployment of a business-critical application. When considering the design for the Cloud Automationand Operations products within the VCF solution, which three design decisions should the architect include based on this information?
(Choose three.)

A. The Cloud Automation and Operations products will be integrated with a single instance of an Identity Broker solution at the primary site.
B. The Cloud Automation and Operations products will be reconfigured to integrate with the Identity Broker solution instance at the standby site in case of a Disaster Recovery incident.
C. The Identity Broker solution will be connected with the corporate directory service for user authentication.
D. The Cloud Automation and Operations products will be integrated directly with the corporate directory service.
E. The Identity Broker solution will be deployed at both the primary and standby site.
F. The Identity Broker solution will be deployed at the primary site and failed over to the standby site in case of a disaster.

正解：A、C、E

解説：
In VMware Cloud Foundation (VCF) 5.2, Cloud Automation (e.g., Aria Automation) and Operations (e.g., Aria Operations) products rely on identity management for authentication. The customer's requirements- corporate directory authentication, Active/Standby across two sites, disaster recovery (DR), network zoning, slow firewall processes, and a 3-month deployment timeline-shape the design decisions. The architect must ensure authentication works efficiently across sites while meeting the timeline and DR needs. Let's evaluate:
Key Constraints and Context:
Authentication: All users/administrators use the corporate directory (e.g., Active Directory in the corporate zone).
Deployment: Active/Standby across two sites, with management apps in a separate tooling zone behind firewalls.
DR: Management apps must recover to the standby site.
Firewall Delays: 8-week minimum per rule, but deployment must occur within 12 weeks (3 months).
Identity Broker: In VCF, VMware Workspace ONE Access (or similar) acts as an identity broker, bridging VCF components with external directories (e.g., AD via LDAP/S).
Evaluation of Options:
Option A: The Cloud Automation and Operations products will be reconfigured to integrate with the Identity Broker solution instance at the standby site in case of a Disaster Recovery incident This implies a single Identity Broker at the primary site, with reconfiguration to a standby instance post-DR.
Reconfiguring products (e.g., updating SSO endpoints) during DR adds complexity and downtime, contradicting the Active/Standby goal of seamless failover. It's feasible but not optimal given the need for continuous operation and the 3-month timeline.
Option B: The Identity Broker solution will be deployed at both the primary and standby site This is correct. Deploying Workspace ONE Access (or equivalent) at both sites supports Active/Standby by ensuring authentication availability at the primary site and immediate usability at the standby site post-DR. It aligns with VCF's multi-site HA capabilities and avoids reconfiguration delays, addressing the DR requirement efficiently within the timeline.
Option C: The Identity Broker solution will be connected with the corporate directory service for user authentication This is correct. The requirement states all users/administrators authenticate via the corporate directory (in the corporate zone). An Identity Broker (e.g., Workspace ONE Access) connects to AD via LDAP/S, acting as a proxy between the management tooling zone and corporate zone. This satisfies the authentication need and simplifies firewall rules (one broker-to-AD connection vs. multiple app connections), critical given the 8- week delay.
Option D: The Identity Broker solution will be deployed at the primary site and failed over to the standby site in case of a disaster This suggests a single Identity Broker with DR failover. While possible (e.g., via vSphere Replication), it risks authentication downtime during failover, conflicting with Active/Standby continuity. The 8-week firewall rule delay for the standby site's broker connection post-DR also jeopardizes the 3-month timeline and DR readiness, making this less viable than dual-site deployment (B).
Option E: The Cloud Automation and Operations products will be integrated with a single instance of an Identity Broker solution at the primary site This is correct. Integrating Aria products with one Identity Broker instance at the primary site during initial deployment simplifies setup and meets the 3-month timeline. It leverages the broker deployed at the primary site (part of B) for authentication, minimizing firewall rules (one broker vs. multiple apps). Pairing this with a standby instance (B) ensures DR readiness without immediate complexity.
Option F: The Cloud Automation and Operations products will be integrated directly with the corporate directory service This is incorrect. Direct integration requires each product (e.g., Aria Automation, Operations) to connect to AD across the firewall, necessitating multiple rule requests. With an 8-week minimum per rule and several products, this exceeds the 3-month timeline. It also complicates DR, as each app would need re-pointing to a standby AD, violating efficiency and zoning policies.
Conclusion:
The three design decisions are:
B: Identity Broker at both sites ensures Active/Standby and DR readiness.
C: Connecting the broker to the corporate directory fulfills the authentication requirement and simplifies firewall rules.
E: Integrating products with a primary-site broker meets the 3-month deployment goal while leveraging B and C for DR.This trio balances timeline, security, and DR needs in VCF 5.2.
References:
VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Architecture and Deployment Guide (Section: Identity and Access Management) VMware Aria Automation 8.10 Documentation (integrated in VCF 5.2): Authentication Design VMware Cloud Foundation 5.2 Planning and Preparation Guide (Section: Multi-Site and DR Considerations)

質問 # 75
......

2V0-13.24学習実践ガイドは、実際の試験を刺激する機能を強化します。クライアントは当社のソフトウェアを使用して、実際の試験を刺激し、実際の2V0-13.24試験の速度、環境、プレッシャーに精通し、実際の試験の準備を整えることができます。仮想試験環境では、クライアントは速度を調整して2V0-13.24の質問に答え、実際の戦闘能力を訓練し、実際のテストのプレッシャーに合わせて調整できます。また、2V0-13.24学習実践ガイドの習熟度を理解することもできます。

2V0-13.24学習指導: https://www.certshiken.com/2V0-13.24-shiken.html